Bookshelf 
Chris Chu Work in progress. |
| I. | Introduction |
| II. | Experimental Results |
| III. | Source Code![]() |
| IV. | Literature![]() |
| V. | License![]() |
(0.075% vs. 0.086%) and is almost as fast as a very efficient implementation of Prim's rectilinear minimum spanning tree (RMST) algorithm
(7% slower). By adjusting the accuracy parameter, the error can be further reduced with only a small increase in runtime (e.g., 3.1x error reduction with 2.0x runtime increase). We perform all experiments in a 3.4-GHz Intel Pentium 4 machine. We compare the following six algorithms on nets from industrial circuits:

[ASPDAC-03, p.827-833]
[TCAD-94, p.1351-1365]The exact RSMT software GeoSteiner 3.1
is used to generate the optimal solutions. Source codes of SPAN and RST-T are obtained from the authors. 18 IBM circuits based on ISPD98 benchmark suite
are used. There are totally 1.57 million nets in the 18 circuits. The placement is generated by FastPlace
. The results are summarized in the following four tables.
|
|
|
|

In Proc. International Conference on Computer Aided Design, pages 696-701, 2004.
In Proc. International Symposium on Physical Design, pages 28-35, 2005.
In IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, 2007.